We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Hey there, Don't forget to log in and join the conversation Log in

Photo credit: James Eacott.

Altra Lone Peak 3.5 trail shoe review

07-Dec-17

Last updated: 20-Aug-18

By James Eacott

Earlier this year I reviewed the Lone Peak 3.0 shoe and, on the whole, I liked it. I felt it would be good over longer ultras upwards of 50 miles due to the plush ride, but that the lack of proprioceptive feedback might hamper runners on more technical trails.

I have actually continued to use the 3.0 for long, low intensity sessions and the shoe has grown on me, so it was with anticipation that I received the next edition – the 3.5 – to see how it stacked up.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

Features

  • Designed for trail running, fast packing and racing
  • Midsole: Midsole: EVA with A-Bound Top Layer
  • Upper: Quick-dry mesh
  • Outsole: MaxTrac Rubber with TrailClaw
  • Insole: 5mm contoured footbed
  • Weight: 255g
  • Drop: 0mm
  • Stack height: 25mm
  • Gaiter track hooks
  • Price: £92

If you’re an observant type, you’ll notice the remarkable resemblance to the features of the 3.0. No, I haven’t just copied and pasted them from the older version (save for the 20g lesser weight) and I’m scratching my head as to why Altra would create such an apparently similar shoe.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

My first impression was the same as when I was greeted by the 3.0. With its large toe box, it is big. It is Hoka big. Still, I’ve grown to enjoy the 3.0 and have learnt to accept the platypus-look as part and parcel of running comfy.

As we know, the trademark of an Altra shoe is the wide toe box. If this is your first pair, it can take a little while for your toes to enjoy their new-found freedom. They may feel too large, but stick with it and your feet will probably thank you. I’ve found Altra’s sizing is ‘correct’ ie you don’t need to size up or down.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

The zero drop encourages a mid-foot strike so those with a heavy heel contact may struggle with them. If a heel strike works for you, then I wouldn’t necessarily change it, but I’d look for another shoe.

However, for those looking to gradually convert to a fore/mid-foot strike, this shoe has a place. Unlike many shoes, the cushioning is equal through the length of the sole and does not taper towards the toe, so it provides a gentle transition into a new style of running.

Pros – what’s good about the Altra Lone Peak 3.5

The cushioning really is excellent. More so than a lot of the Hoka range, the stack height of 25mm throughout the entire sole means you do get good cushion through the entire ground-strike.

These shoes actually arrived on my ‘long run’ day and, rather than do a shorter run (as would be advisable in a new pair of kicks) I felt so comfy in my living room that I hit the treadmill for a 90-minute run with some marathon-paced efforts. I was really pleased with them. A couple of blisters between the toes, but I suppose that is a side-effect of having more wiggle room. That said, the ride was plush and extremely comfortable.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

After a few weeks of running on all sorts of terrain, it’s obvious the whole upper has increased durability. This is pleasing to see as it was after a couple of months in the 3.0 shoe that stitches began to fray.

At this time of year, I predominantly run either hard-packed, road or treadmill and I love that the 3.5 is at home on them all. It is a solid jack-of-all-trades. Altra do have shoes for ‘daily training’ and ‘road racing’ should you wish to get a specialist for that.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

The grip on hard packed trails was good though I only managed to test them in dry conditions. I can’t comment on the shoe’s performance on the wetter stuff, but the tread is near identical to the 3.0 and it didn’t hold up that well on slippery stuff. I used the shoe twice on more technical trails, but again found myself less confident in my foot placement. This is the same as with Hokas and probably due to subconscious lack of feeling beneath a thick sole. No shoe can cover every base and that’s ok with me.

The shoe is priced much more favourably than the 3.0.

Cons – what’s not so good about the Altra Lone Peak 3.5

The lacing system is somehow different and I found it harder to get a secure fit in the 3.5. I eventually had to pull the upper laces tight to hold my foot in place. When I didn’t do this, my foot moved too freely.

RUNULTRA_Altra-Lone-Peak-3_5-review

The only other slight con (presumably due to the large toe box) were some between-toes blisters in the first few runs. Nothing that some tape or a pair of Injinji socks can’t solve.

Conclusion

As obvious from the features, it’s a rather modest renovation of the former edition, and I have to say it doesn’t feel much different to the 3.0. The shoe offers a comfy ride and good grip on all but very technical trails and I personally like the zero drop because I’m a mid-foot striker. The price is a significant improvement and I’d see no reason to purchase the 3.0 now.

As I said earlier, it’s a solid jack-of-all-trades, good value and will provide a comfortable ride on most surfaces.

Score  
Design 7/10
Features 7/10
Performance 7/10
Value 8/10
Total 7.25/10


Other running shoes you may want to consider:

Hoka One One Speedgoat 2
Mizuno Wave Daichi 2
Hoke One One Arahi

Have you used the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 shoes? Don’t agree with this review? What’s your opinion? Add your own comment to this review and share your experience and passion for running with others.

Not a member yet? Sign up here to be part of the RunUltra community and share tips and stories with thousands of fellow runners around the world.

All images James Eacott.

We are a professional review site and our reviewers receive free products for testing from the companies whose products we review. We test each product thoroughly and give high marks to only the very best. We are independently owned and the opinions expressed here are by the reviewer’s name shown.

Disclosure:
We use affiliate links in some of our reviews and articles. This means that if you purchase an item through one of these links we will earn a commission. You will not pay more when buying a product through our links but the income will help us to keep bringing you our free training guides, reviews and other content to enjoy. Thank you in advance for your support.

OUR RATING

Product Rating

YOUR RATING

Image Mask
3 REVIEWS

“The grip on hard packed trails was good though I only managed to test them in dry conditions.”

Where to buy

Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes for women View deal
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes for women View deal
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes for women View deal
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes for women View deal
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes for men View deal
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 running shoes View deal
LIKE WHAT YOU READ?
SIGN UP FOR MORE

Review Altra Lone Peak 3.5 trail shoe review

You must be logged in to add your review, click here to login or click here to register

Avatar
Comment Arrow

Drowsell

07:05 27-04-18

Got my pair of Lone Peak 3.5 this spring. I was looking for a shoe which was going to give me more cushioning but was also minimalist in nature. To explain, I suffered a severe herniated disc in January 2017 which resulted in a loss of some everter muscles and some small muscles in my foot which meant I did not have as much control over footfall as I used to. I use the Altras in conjunction with my Brooks Grit 5 (Altras for over 30Km 1500m+/-D). The Altra is an excellent shoe. The comfort of the wide toe box is extraordinary, really allowing the toes to flex in a natural way (watch a 3 year old run and see how their toes grab the ground). On technical trail (I run in the Alps) the Altra sole is very protective. The balance of the shoe is superb, as good as the Grit and promotes a forward footfall. The grip on downhill is strong, particularly on slab rock, and allows you to lean forward without discomfort. Overall protection is good (for the weight) so I have had no painful blows to the big toes or metatarsals. I never thought I would find myself in "spongy" shoes, but now I am I have no regrets.

Comment Arrow

Redbikejohn

05:14 24-04-18

Good review. I'm fairly new to running and have made plenty of mistake, one of which was having too tight shoes that led to an inflamed toe joint/tendon. This is how I came to buy a pair of Altra 3.5's - I needed a really wide fitting shoe and everything I tried on in local running shoes just pressed on the side of my foot too much. I'm normally a 10.5 UK size but wear a 11 UK in merrell walking shoes. The UK 10.5 was also too tight so I tried the 11 on but as I have short feet 11's are normally too long. While the 11 still felt tight they were not too long so I tried a 11.5 UK and it fits great. Anyone with short wide feet need to use these shoes. I found running in them for the first few times a little odd but I didn't have issues with the zero drop, but the booklet that comes with the shoes does recommend limited use in the begining. I'm thinking of buying a second pair.

Avatar
Comment Arrow

runeatrepeat

05:02 21-04-18

Really helpful review, thanks. In the market for trail shoes at the moment and had Altra discount from The Running Awards goodie bag.